NanoMQ - Stage 1 - 2025-11-19

NanoMQ - Stage 1 - 2025-11-19


Completed by:  Jaylin Yu, EMQ

Submitted to TAC Mail List:  YYYY/MM/DD

Presented on TAC Weekly Call:  Not Applicable


 

Below is a self-assessment submitted by TSC Chair/Maintainers of the Project. Comments/questions/feedback is welcome either a) in the Comments at the bottom of the page or b) during the TAC call when information is presented

Stage 1: At Large Projects 

Stage 2 and Stage 3 Projects also requested to complete this section, as PLD acceptance criteria requires meeting current as well as prior stage requirements

Stage 1 Criteria (from the PLD)

Meets / Needs Improvement / Missing / Not Applicable

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

Stage 1 Criteria (from the PLD)

Meets / Needs Improvement / Missing / Not Applicable

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

2 TAC Sponsors, if identified (Sponsors help mentor projects) - See full definition on Project Stages: Definitions and Expectations

Meets

*Jim White (IoTech)

@Joe Pearson (IBM)

The typical IP Policy for Projects under the LF Edge Foundation is Apache 2.0 for Code Contributions, Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO) for new inbound contributions, and Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License for Documentation. Projects under outside licenses may still submit for consideration, subject to review/approval of the TAC and Board.

Meets

MIT

Upon acceptance, At Large projects must list their status prominently on website/readme

Meets

website

Additional Information Requested from All Projects

Additional Information Requested from All Projects

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

Additional Information Requested from All Projects

Supporting Data (if needed, include links to specific examples)

Intention for the upcoming year (Remain at current stage OR advance towards the next Stage)

Remain

Include a link to your project’s LFX Insights page. We will be looking for signs of consistent or increasing contribution activity. Please feel free to add commentary to add color to the numbers and graphs we will see on Insights.

Star growth: from 1584 to 2219

refer to https://github.com/nanomq/nanomq/graphs/contributors?from=2023%2F10%2F21 & https://github.com/nanomq/NanoNNG/graphs/contributors?from=2023%2F10%2F21

2025 Download Growth: 234K+

 

How many maintainers do you have, and which organizations are they from? (Feel free to link to an existing MAINTAINERS file if appropriate.)

4, from EMQ

Contributor: 48 (14+)

What do you know about adoption, and how has this changed since your last review / since you joined the current Stage? If you can list companies that are end users of your project, please do so. (Feel free to link to an existing ADOPTERS file if appropriate.)

Notable adoptors

  • Deployed in millions of vehicles

  • IIoT 4.0 manufacturing field

  • Community users

 

 

How has the project performed against its goals since the last review? (We won't penalize you if your goals changed for good reasons.)

 

  • Achieve better observability via probe based on ebpf. ×

  • A new streaming storage system is based on Apache Parquet. Also supports data fetching & searching ✅

  • Enhance security by developing a universal fuzzer. Cooperate with security researchers from Uni. ✅ invest in HK ITF project. NanoMQ is mentioned in multiple acdamic papers

  • Plug & Play: congestion control and Topic/QoS prioritization in MQTT over Quic ✅

What are the current goals of the project? For example, are you working on major new features? Or are you concentrating on adoption or documentation?

No significant goals available. Due to stressful project deliver work.

How can LF Edge help you achieve your upcoming goals?

  • Work with Linux Foundation more closedly.

  • We have already joined ELISA & AGL. would like to see overlaping collaborations or even merging organizations. (InstantX in AGL?)

Do you think that your project meets the criteria for the next Stage?

Almost there, except for the community's diversity; all maintainers are from EMQ now.

Not sure how it can benefit NanoMQ?

Please summarize Outreach Activities in which the Project has participated in (e.g. Participation in conferences, seminars, speaking engagements, meetups, etc.)

Conferences/meetups:

Jaylin presented in

Saudi Aramco Summit Shanghai

OpenSource Summit Korea Safety-critical track

OpenSource Summit Japan Safety-critical track + Automotive-Grade Linux track

Are you leveraging the Technical Project Getting Started Checklist? If yes, please provide link (if publicly available).

No

Please review, and update if needed, your Project entry on the Existing Project Taxonomy page, modifying the Last Updated / Reviewed date in the header.

Reviewed

Please share a LFX security report for your project in the last 30 days

https://security.lfx.linuxfoundation.org/#/lfHLJOgoBU33bj0kpp/overview