...
Tina Tsou Wilson Wang Haruhisa Fukano Jeff Brower Borui Li (李博睿) Moshe Shadmon John Freier Yona Cao Tom Qin Qi Tang Tom Qin saiyan68 Victor Lu Caleb mengyu hang
Meeting Summary
https://bytedance.us.larkoffice.com/minutes/obusytn5t7g2r2921b5jcvo3obus4md7h8993i554s7rne18?from=from_copylink
meeting notes
AI meeting notes are generated from the meeting recording and may not reflect the views or positions of our platform. Please review them carefully.
Summary
The meeting discussed the progress and next steps of the Edge Lake project, as well as preparations for an event. The of work streams 1-4 and related plans, the main contents included:
Edge Lake project: Tina Tsou met with Jiayi's manager in Beijing to seek approval for Jiayi to work on the project.
MVP document: Wilson Wang updated the overview and work streams, and discussed whether to create an MVP document for each work stream or just for Yumu and Shifu.
Work stream updates: Yuna will discuss details with Wilson tomorrow. Rick may be involved in work stream 2. Wilson will work on the architecture and have a meeting with Ken from Opera.
Federated learning: Jing is waiting for help from G to integrate federated learning into the edge part.
Event planning: HaruhisaFukano provided updates on the event, including the CFP, registration, and facilities. The meeting also discussed inviting more attendees and presenters.
Chapters
...
This section involves discussions among Tina Tsou, Wilson Wang, and others. Jiayi is interested in a project but needs manager approval. A demo is aimed for the next month's conference. Yuna couldn't make it to today's meeting. Wilson shared an update regarding MVP and raised a question about writing MVP DOC for different tasks.
...
This section discusses the need for a clear summary of the problem each project product aims to solve before delving into details. There's a debate on the placement of MVP documents and related materials for work streams. It's agreed that for MVP pages, only Yumu and Shifu will be included, and related materials for other work streams will be under respective pages. Wilson Wang plans to make changes with Cici and Yuna.
...
This section discusses various work streams. Yuna is setting up a meeting with Wilson Wang for work stream 1. For work stream 1, access to dobound image to image model is needed. For work stream 2, one-on-one pings are suggested. In work stream 3, updates were made in the architecture part and a meeting with Ophir is planned. Also, the name for SES might change and candidates will be provided for selection.
...
This section began with moving to work stream 4. One speaker said their side had everything deployed except federated learning and needed help. Wilson mentioned interest in Ashley's role in the SAS part and suggested offline discussion. Tina suggested a leader discussion on events. HaruhisaFukano joined late and shared about the event's legislation and 16 received answers.
...
This section discusses the capacity of a meeting room, allowing a maximum of 40 non-employees. Tina suggests inviting friends to fill the spots. Wilson drafted a poster, which was shared. They will announce the event and keep FAI people updated. There are 3 CFP answers so far and more are needed. Haruhisa reflected edits to the CFP form.
...
This section discusses various points. Jeff points out spelling errors like with Edge Lake. There's a discussion on having each project chair introduce their project in the first sessions, either through a talk or presentation. Some are willing to give an introduction, and the aim is to help others understand project activities, concepts, and open source aspects.
...
This section focuses on preparations for a summit presentation. HaruhisaFukano explains the need for a short description of the presentation, including details about edge and each project under LFH to attract more people. They discuss submitting the session to the CFP form. The CFP nomination has started and will close on August 17th, with the schedule announcement on August 24th. They encourage spreading the event and promoting CFP submissions.
...
This section discusses equipment availability and arrangements for a meeting. Laptops can potentially be borrowed from TikTok. The possibility of using both Lark and Zoom simultaneously is considered. A zoom link will be prepared. Information regarding hackersons needs to be clarified and questions added to the legislation form. Tina requested a laptop for presentation and Wilson will double-check with the ID team.
...
This section mainly discusses the hackathon event. There are plans to make options clearer for attendees and participants. HaruhisaFukano will update the forms and send them to relevant people. Tina Tsou suggests involving the FAI team after the meeting. Victor's work on the manufacturing overview document is mentioned. Action items include Wilson discussing the MVP and HaruhisaFukano updating the event status with the FAI team.
...
Work Stream 1 MVP and Western Contribution: Yuna shared the features and updates of Work Stream 1, including globally located AI inference infrastructure, AI API Bridge, function calling service, and prompt management.
Work Stream 3 Architecture and AI Workload: Wilson discussed the architectural design of Work Stream 3, focusing on the balance of request processing and the integration of Yumo. He also mentioned the need for Vector Database and other database functionalities in the AI workload.
Work Stream 4 Federated Landing Function: The status and plan of Work Stream 4 were discussed, aiming to submit a proposal for the developer meeting and demonstrate federated learning at the edge on top of Edge Lake.
Edge AI Overview and MVP: The overview of Edge AI and the MVP were discussed, including the completion status of Q1 and Q2, the plan for Q3, and the need for a better structure for the developers.
Event and Code: The event team provided an update on the event, including the CFPs nomination and the hacker song proposal. Tina Tsou encouraged participants to submit proposals and invited five friends to register. Volunteers were needed to review the code and propose a better structure for developers.
Chapters
00:12 Discussion on Work Stream 1 of Geo Distributed Cloud and Related Suggestions
This section is about a meeting discussing work Stream 1. Yuna shared updates on the Geo distributed cloud called Web Wave Grade for AI agents, highlighting its features. Wilson Wang suggested adding tags for better understanding of use cases. There was also mention of collaboration between work Stream 1 and 3. Tina Tsou was coordinating and seeking questions or self-introductions.
08:25 Discussion on Edge-related Work Streams and Contributions
This section is a meeting transcript. John introduced himself and his background. Discussion focused on various work streams. Qi got disconnected. Bo Rui discussed progress on Work Stream 3. Tina Tsou raised questions about contributions for Work Stream 2, expressing interest from colleagues. Engineering plans and needed help were discussed.
15:51 Discussions on Work Stream Team, Architectural Design and Updates
This section mainly covered discussions about work-related matters. Tina suggested laying out plant needs and developers sought. Updates on the web page were mentioned. There were talks about contacting Rick and integrating components from Yomo. Wilson discussed the architectural design, AI workloads, and plans to improve the image. Spelling mistakes and image precision were also noted.
22:50 Updates and Discussions on Work Streams and Federated Learning
This section discusses various topics including updates on documents, the relationship of services and farces, and the progress of work stream four. Wilson will make more updates. For work stream four, the goal is to submit a proposal for the developer meeting and demonstrate federated learning at the edge. Jiayi and Meng Yu are reviewing the edge lake. The data received will determine the models to be built.
29:51 Discussion on Work Streams, Updates and Proposals in a Project Meeting
This section discussed plans including John orchestrating the process, creating a blurb for the developers meeting, aiming to show a demo in September. They also talked about reaching out for meetings, sharing emails, work stream updates like Q2 being incomplete, the potential addition of a fifth work stream for edge gateways, and the need to update code. No objections were raised to the new work stream proposal.
37:30 Discussions on Code Structure, Event Updates and Proposals in a Meeting
This section covered discussions on the code structure for developers, the event status including a break in Japan, the COFO proposal, submission of proposals and related issues like form options and typos. Program committee members' assignment for proposal review after August 17 and the registration process for the hackson were also touched upon.
44:49 Planning and Discussions for an Automated AI Management Project and Related Events
This section mainly covers event planning details by Tina Tsou. She discussed Microsoft form registration for teams, event prices and sponsorship, food and drink booking. She'll have a one-on-one with Jeff for it. Also, there's mention of help for the AECO project with Meng Yu and a discussion on creating an automated AI setup at the edge with a possible screen share.
49:57 Edge Lake: Features, AI Process and Collaboration Discussions
This section discusses Edge Lake, its features including data remaining at the edge, services on nodes, an abstraction layer, and a virtualization layer. It also covers AI aspects like federated learning at the edge, automated processes, and potential collaboration on related projects. The meeting touched on sharing the deck on the wiki page and scheduling further discussions.
01:06:06 Updates and Discussions on Work Streams and Hack Song Proposals
This section involves task allocations such as Yona adding methods for submitting hacker song proposals and updating prices, Wilson updating the architecture and looking into the code structure, Qi giving the engineering plan update, and Bo Rui preparing a presentation. The discussion also touches on highlighting the cash price for the hack song and possibly creating an image for sharing. Additionally, it's unsure if the nomination and voting deadline for the culture has passed.