Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Partner Representatives

Alternates

Company/Org

Nathan Phelps

IBM

James Butcher 

Brad Corrion

IOTech Systems

alain nochimowski 

Dan Ghita

Viaccess-Orca

Julien Cassignol 

Cristian Popi

Wallix

Alexander Scheel (TSC Chair, Dev WG Chair)

Jocelyn Eillis

GitLab, Inc.

Non-TSC observers: Adfinis (Michael, Andrii)

Time
(mins)

Agenda Items

Presented By

Presos/Notes/Links/

2

Welcome

5

Announcement and Issues

Finding a replacement TAC sponsor?

  • At LF Edge EoY summary, OpenBao had a single TAC sponsor since IBM had stepped down (likely as part of the acquisition or due to self-sponsorship).

  • Talk about stage 2 growth at next meeting (Feb '25).

  • Suggestion (Feb '25): Table until subproject home identified.

FOSDEM + SOOCon recaps.

5

Decisions

  • Should OpenBao start putting together recommendations for budget(s) in the event of direct funding?

    • Should OpenBao investigate how to and begin selling merch to fund the project and allow individuals to show support?

      • YC uses FourthWall which supports stickers

      • OpenSSF uses MySpreadShop, and also has stickers. Likely will prefer LF approved vendor.

      • Tabled until membership is decided

    • AI @ Alex & Community: Formally propose expenses to the TSC.

  • Should the TSC Membership process proposal be adopted as written (email, gist)?

    • Motioned: E-Vote poll on this, 1st GitLab, 2nd IOTech.

  • Should OpenBao consider moving out of LF Edge into another LF subproject more suitable to our membership?

    • OpenSSF, CNCF, FinOS, and direct membership have all been expressed as options.

    • Staying in LF Edge is an option but we’re short two requirements for stage 1:

      • 1. TAC sponsor

      • 2. A premier membership company.

2

Upcoming Events

5

Opens



2

Next Meeting

  • February 13th, 2025


...

Voting Template

TSC Voting to Approve XYZExploring (not committing to – such would subject to another electronic vote later) move to OpenSSF, and to contact LF & OpenSSF regarding such a move and what it would entail:

Motion:  GitLab

Second:  IOTech