Page Comparison

Required Information

Responses (Please list N/A if not applicable)

Name of Project

Automatos

Project Description (what it does, why it is valuable, origin and history)

What does Automatos do?

Automatos provides complete end-to-end manageability and infrastructure orchestration for all edges across various IoT verticals such as retail, health care, manufacturing, banking and entertainment. It is designed and built from ground up using modular microservices-based software stack focusing on heterogeneous needs of IoT verticals.

Why it is valuable?

The two main valuable functional components are manageability and infrastructure orchestration. It provides features for orchestrating real time deterministic and real time workloads, small footprint orchestrators and demonstrate the ability to scale. It also provides additional value-add such as policy driven configuration engine, security, AI/ML capabilities, telemetry, automation and can interoperate with any Kubernetes distribution. Automatos can be used to deploy Kubernetes clusters in several different ways such as virtual cluster, on-premises cluster existing cluster., dynamic cluster and Hybrid cloud. The value of Automatos to customers comes from:

o   Tight integration of Intel platform capabilities with the ability to easily deploy and manage both the platforms (manageability) and the workloads (orchestration) based on customer and solution requirements. These capabilities are critical where data collection and data processing must take place at the edge (often due to latency requirements, or cost and time of sending raw data to the cloud and waiting for the processed results to be delivered back to the edge where the activity takes place.

o   Ease of deployment, resulting in potential reduction in customer TCO over the solution life.

o   New business opportunities resulting from solutions created with Automatos orchestration and manageability ingredients. These opportunities can drive industry transformation, enable new customer solutions, and engage with new markets.

Origin and History

Automatos was released as open source software by Intel Corporation in July 2022, based on Intel® Edge Conductor V0.4.0 for LF EDGE Evaluation purposes.

The original Intel® Edge Conductor launched in Oct 2021 as an Internal Intel reference platform reflecting the original technologies such as Orchestration and Manageability technologies including Secure Device Onboarding (SDO) by Intel IoT group. With the complex ecosystem needed for success of this product, we decided to open source Automatos to the community in order to drive eco-system adoption, resolve key industry manageability and orchestrion automation points, and allow the IOT market to grow faster.  We believe that open sourcing with a vibrant ecosystem will allow Automatos to evolve into a true Orchestrator for all edges across various IoT verticals.

Statement on alignment with Foundation Mission Statement

One of the primary objectives of Automatos is to automate, ease and scale Edge deployments and increase TAM on the Edge. To achieve this goal, a cross-industry collaboration of device manufacturers; distributors; systems integrators; cloud service providers and device management software vendors is required to accelerate adoption.  The Linux Foundation is the ideal organization to facilitate this collaboration and accelerate adoption of these important technologies.

High level assessment of project synergy with existing projects under LF Edge, including how the project compliments/overlaps with existing projects, and potential ways to harmonize over time. Responses may be included both here and/or in accompanying documentation. 

Automatos will accelerate adoption of cluster formation, deployment and workload orchestration into all IoT ecosystems, helping drive the need for all of the current projects in the LF EDGE community.

Integration with LF EDGE enabled devices could simplify the installation and deployment of current and newly manufactured devices and orchestrate the workload that runs on them.

Link to current Code of Conduct

https://lfprojects.org/policies/code-of-conduct/

2 TAC Sponsors, if identified (Sponsors help mentor projects) - See full definition on Project Stages: Definitions and Expectations

TBD

Project license

Apache License 2.0

Source control (GitHub by default)

GitHub

Issue tracker (GitHub by default)

GitHub

External dependencies (including licenses)

Release methodology and mechanics

Automatos currently follows a release cadence of approximately 13 weeks, typically with 9 weeks allocated for development, three weeks for test and validation, and one week for final check and release. Critical defects identified in the three-week test & validation phase are resolved and the code base updated to create a final release candidate for the final week of validation.  Release artifacts are generated by a fully automated CI system.  Integration test and validation includes both automated and manual testing and provides end-to-end testing of the Automatos components running on Intel based platforms.

Names of initial committers, if different from those submitting proposal

TBD

Current number of code contributors to proposed project

20

Current number of organizations contributing to proposed project

1

Briefly describe the project's leadership team and decision-making process

Balaji Ethirajulu (Intel), Sr.Director - SW Product Management, is the “product owner” and is responsible for identifying the feature roadmap for the Automatos project. He collaborates with members of the Automatos ecosystem, LF Edge members, and other industry leaders to identify emerging requirements and features. We anticipate that this process will expand to include others in a Automatos technical steering committee comprised of community contributors and ecosystem stakeholders. Balaji Ethirajulu has contributed to open source community over a decade and also held various leadership positions in Linux Foundation projects over the years.

Hussein Alayan (Intel) is the Program manager for Automatos where he is responsible for planning and processes. He has previously contributed to the LF Edge Secure Device Onboard project.  We anticipate that Hussein will be an initial maintainer for the Automatos project.

Bruce Jones (Intel) is the chief architect for Automatos. He is responsible for translating the feature roadmap into technical requirements and architectural specifications, for maintenance of the Automatos specification, and for the overall security architecture of Automatos  We anticipate that he will continue in this role as part of the Automatos Technical Steering Committee.

Yong Hu (Intel), Sanjay Mukherjee (Intel), Nicolae Jascanu (Intel) and David Schneider (Intel) are the technical engineering leads for the Automatos project.  Yong and Sanjay are responsible for software development. Nicolae is responsible for validation and David is the responsible for oversite of devops and ci/cd activities. We anticipate that they will be initial maintainers for the Automatos project, with responsibility for ensuring contributions are properly and promptly reviewed and approved, and that they will eventually be joined by other contributors as the community of contributors grows.

David Cobbley (Intel): Automatos  – Engineering Director.

Automatos is a complex project comprising several sub-components spanning embedded devices to cloud services.  As the community of contributors grows, we anticipate that the governance model will evolve into a core team/sub-team model similar to the one used by the Rust project as described here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1068-rust-governance.md.

List of project's official communication channels (slack, irc, mailing lists)

As a recently opening open source project, we plan to work with LF EDGE in setting up communication and net presence (slack, website, social media, etc...)

Link to project's website

As a recently opening open source project, we plan to work with LF EDGE in setting up communication and net presence (slack, website, social media, etc...)

Links to social media accounts

As a recently opening open source project, we plan to work with LF EDGE in setting up communication and net presence (slack, website, social media, etc...)

Existing financial sponsorship

Intel Corporation

Infrastructure needs or requests (to include GitHub/Gerrit, CI/CD, Jenkins, Nexus, JIRA, other ...)

·        Automatos is moving its continuous integration (CI) infrastructure to Jenkins. If LF EDGE has an alternative solution, we would be interested in learning more about its capabilities and associated costs.

·        The Automatos plans to maintain both its source and documentation repositories on GitHub.

·        The Automatos project plans to move its documentation to GitHub Pages.   IF LF EDGE has an alternative solution, we would be interested in learning more about its capabilities and associated costs.

·        The Automatos project would benefit from access to a Jira instance (or equivalent) managed by LF EDGE.

The Automatos project would benefit from access to a Slack channel (or equivalent) managed by LF EDGE.

Currently Supported Architecture

x86, x86-64, ARM

Planned Architecture Support

N/A

Project logo in svg format (see https://github.com/lf-edge/lfedge-landscape#logos for guidelines)

As a recently opening open source project, we plan to work with LF EDGE in setting up communication and net presence (slack, website, social media, etc...)

Trademark status

N/A

Does the project have a Core Infrastructure Initiative security best practices badge? (See: https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org)

No - however, the team is familiar with the Core Infrastructure security badge process and will consider pursuing that badge in the future.

Any additional information the TAC and Board should take into consideration when reviewing your proposal?

No

Criteria

Data

2 TAC Sponsors, if identified (Sponsors help mentor projects) - See full definition on Project Stages: Definitions and Expectations

TBD

A presentation at an upcoming meeting of the TAC, in accordance with the project proposal requirements

Yes

The typical IP Policy for Projects under the LF Edge Foundation is Apache 2.0 for Code Contributions, Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO) for new inbound contributions, and Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License for Documentation. Projects under outside licenses may still submit for consideration, subject to review/approval of the TAC and Board.

Yes

Upon acceptance, At Large projects must list their status prominently on website/readme

Yes

Functions

(Provide, Consume, Facilitate, or N/A; Add context as needed)

APIs

Provides

Cloud Connectivity

Provide and Facilitate

Container Runtime & Orchestration

Provide and Facilitate

Data Governance

N/A

Data Models

N/A

Device Connectivity

Consumes – HTTP, HTTPs, with architectural support for other connectivity protocols not yet implemented

Filters/Pre-processing

N/A

Logging

Provides

Management UI

Provides (some use cases)

Messaging & Events

Provides

Notifications & Alerts

Provides

Security

Provides

Storage

Provides

Deployment Type

(Support, Possible, N/A; Add context as needed)

Customer Devices (Edge Nodes)

Support

Customer Premises (DC and Edge Gateways)

Support

Telco Network Edge (MEC and Far-MEC)

Possible

Telco CO & Regional

Possible

Cloud Edge & CDNs

Support

Public Cloud

Support

Private Cloud

Support

Directly applicable Industry/Verticals use cases

(✔ or X; Add context as needed)

Automotive / Connected Car

✔

Chemicals

X

Facilities / Building automation

✔

Consumer

X

Manufacturing

✔

Metal & Mining

✔

Oil & Gas

✔

Pharma

✔

Health Care

✔

Power & Utilities

✔

Pulp & Paper

✔

Telco Operators

✔

Telco/Communications Service Provider (Network Equipment Provider)

✔

Transportation (asset tracking)

✔

Supply Chain

✔

Preventative Maintenance

✔

Water Utilities

✔

Security / Surveillance

✔

Retail / Commerce (physical point of sale with customers)

✔

Other - Please add if not listed above (please notify TAC-subgroup@lists.lfedge.org when you add one)

Use Cases

(✔ or X; Add context as needed)

Gateways (to Cloud, to other placements)

✔

NFV Infrastructure

✔

Stationary during their entire usable life / Fixed placement edge constellations / Assume you always have connectivity and you don't need to store & forward.

✔

Stationary during active periods, but nomadic between activations (e.g., fixed access) / Not always assumed to have connectivity. Don't expect to store & forward.

X

Mobile within a constrained and well-defined space (e.g., in a factory) / Expect to have intermittent connectivity and store & forward.

✔

Fully mobile (To include: Wearables and Connected Vehicles) / Bursts of connectivity and always store & forward.

✔

Compute Stack Layers

(Provide, Require, or N/A; Add context as needed)

APIs

Provide

Applications

Provide

Firmware

Require

Hardware

Require

Orchestration

Provide

OS

Require

VM/Containers

 Provide  / Provide

Cloud Stack Layers

(Provide, Require, or N/A; Add context as needed)

Applications

Yes

Configuration (drive)

Yes

Content (management system)

Yes

IaaS

Yes

PaaS

Yes

Physical Infrastructure

No

SaaS

                                         TBD